Professor fails students after ChatGPT falsely accuses them of cheating

ChatGPT stock photo 11

Edgar Cervantes /


  • A school professor has reportedly punished scholars for the use of AI to jot down their papers.
  • On the other hand, the professor used ChatGPT to decide whether or not those papers have been AI-generated.

It’s no longer exceptional for college kids to cheat on their homework through the use of generative AI platforms reminiscent of ChatGPT. On the other hand, the likes of ChatGPT aren’t excellent at detecting AI-generated works. That hasn’t stopped a school professor from reportedly taking this means, with disastrous effects.

A Texas A&M College professor it seems that punished 15 scholars for the use of ChatGPT to generate their papers, in line with a Reddit put up (h/t: ). The affected scholars got an incomplete grade on their papers and due to this fact had their diplomas placed on transient cling pending an investigation.

On the other hand, it seems that the professor merely fed the papers into ChatGPT itself in a bid to decide whether or not they have been AI-generated works.

Misguided use of ChatGPT

“In grading your closing 3 assignments I’ve opened my very own account for Chat GTP (sic). I reproduction and paste your responses on this account and Chat GTP will inform me if this system generated the content material,” learn an excerpt of the professor’s letter, in line with a screenshot taken through Redditor DearKick, who’s a fiance of an affected pupil.

“I put everybody’s closing 3 assignments thru two separate instances and in the event that they have been each claimed through Chat GTP you won a nil.”

Have you ever used ChatGPT, Bard, or Bing Chat for paintings or faculty?

12 votes

Except the truth that the professor didn’t spell ChatGPT as it should be, the platform merely isn’t in a position to correctly figuring out whether or not works are generated through AI. There are services and products focusing on detecting AI works with various levels of luck (e.g. Flip It In and GPTZero), however the trainer plainly didn’t use them.

Lending credence to ChatGPT’s questionable verification skill was once the truth that the chatbot claimed the trainer’s 2021 analysis paper was once itself written through AI. Understand that, AI platforms like ChatGPT, Bing Chat, and Google Bard are at risk of incorrect information and so-called hallucinations every now and then.