Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 specifications: A contention renewed

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 in hand front - Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 in hand front - Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000

Qualcomm is the king of the hill in relation to flagship processors, as nearly all main producers (except for Huawei) use its Snapdragon 800 sequence of their top-end telephones.

After a long absence within the area, then again, MediaTek is as soon as once more enjoying within the flagship section. So how does Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 865 processor examine to the MediaTek Dimensity 1000? Find out on this Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 specifications comparability!

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 specifications

 Snapdragon 865Dimensity 1000
CPU Config1x 2.84GHz (Cortex A77)
3x 2.4GHz (Cortex A77)
4x 1.8GHz (Cortex-A55)
4x 2.6GHz (Cortex A77)
4x 2GHz (Cortex A55)
GPUAdreno 650Mali-G77 MP9
AIHexagon 698
Hexagon Tensor Accelerator
hexa-core APU
2x heavy cores
3x medium cores
1x gentle core
Camera strengthen200MP snapshot / 64MP unmarried with Zero Shutter Lag
24MP twin digital camera
80MP unmarried / 32 and 16MP twin
Video seize8K @ 30fps, 4K UHD @ 120fps, 720p @ 960fps4K UHD @ 60fps
ChargingQuick Charge 4+
Quick Charge AI
Pump Express
ModemX55 5G & RF device
7500 Mbps down
3000 Mbps up
Helio M70 5G
4700 Mbps down
2500 Mbps up


Take a have a look at sheer horsepower and there’s no denying that each chipsets be offering an excellent quantity of grunt. Qualcomm serves up a three-tier CPU association, that includes one semi-custom Cortex-A77 core clocked at 2.84Ghz, three semi-custom Cortex-A77 cores clocked at 2.4Ghz, and four tweaked Cortex-A55 cores operating at 1.8Ghz.

MediaTek’s chipset opts for a extra standard means, the use of four Cortex-A77 cores at 2.6Ghz and four Cortex-A55 cores at 2Ghz. It’s attention-grabbing that the corporate didn’t cross after the heavy/medium/gentle CPU association it pioneered within the first position.

Editor’s Pick

If you suppose the entirety else is equivalent, then it kind of feels like Qualcomm would possibly have the threshold in single-core efficiency because of its top-end core hitting 2.84Ghz. But MediaTek might be very aggressive relating to multi-core efficiency owing to its four Cortex-A77 CPUs clocked at 2.6Ghz — upper than Qualcomm’s medium cores. Again, that is assuming that the entirety (i.e. cache, production procedure, and different elements) is equivalent between the two chipsets.

An obvious Snapdragon 865 Geekbench ranking unearths a single-core ranking of 4,303 issues and a multi-core ranking of 13,344. Meanwhile, MediaTek in the past claimed that its Dimensity 1000 chipset hits a multi-core ranking of 12,096 issues (there’s no phrase on single-core efficiency). Either approach, it seems like MediaTek may be very just about, however now not fairly passing Qualcomm within the CPU division if each benchmarks are correct.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 inside parts slides

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 inside parts slides

Shifting to graphical efficiency, Qualcomm’s Adreno GPUs are usually thought to be the most productive smartphone GPUs within the business. Arm’s Mali graphics have typically lagged in the back of Adreno silicon on this regard, even though producers have controlled to slender the distance moderately through the use of extra Mali graphics cores. The Snapdragon 865 GPU delivers a claimed 25% growth over the Snapdragon 855, and due to this fact has an growth of kind of 10% over the Snapdragon 855 Plus.

MediaTek’s Dimensity 1000 touts a new-generation Mali-G77 MP9 GPU, with two fewer cores than the Exynos 990‘s Mali-G77 MP11. In truth, again on the chip’s release, MediaTek touted 15% and 11% higher rankings in GFXBench Manhattan 3.0 and 3.1 assessments respectively as opposed to the Snapdragon 855. This unquestionably suggests a high-end gaming platform, however that was once towards the Snapdragon 855 somewhat than the Snapdragon 855 Plus. So we’re anticipating the Snapdragon 865 to near in on and most likely move MediaTek right here.

Still, the truth that each Samsung and MediaTek are the use of fewer GPU cores in its new chipsets suggests Arm is making giant strides.

Related: Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs Kirin 990 vs Exynos 990

We’re additionally seeing GPU energy getting used to permit upper refresh charges, and each manufacturers ship. Qualcomm is the transparent winner, supporting 60Hz at 4K, and as much as 144Hz for QHD+ displays. MediaTek notes that it helps 90Hz at QHD+, and 120Hz at FHD+ resolutions.

Even if the two firms had been on equivalent footing relating to graphics, Qualcomm nonetheless has one giant further feather in its cap. The Snapdragon 865, 765 sequence, and long term chipsets will permit customers to replace GPU drivers by the use of the Play Store. Graphics drivers are typically packaged in device updates, so this must theoretically lead to a quicker approach to get up to date drivers.

MediaTek lately has no resolution to Qualcomm providing GPU motive force updates by the use of the Play Store.

GPU motive force updates can ship worm fixes, in addition to quicker, extra polished efficiency in video games and different apps. But cell phones have typically lagged some distance in the back of PCs in relation to the frequency of updates.

We’ve requested MediaTek and Arm about the potential of them imposing GPU motive force updates by the use of the Play Store sooner or later. Arm says it’s not able to remark at the plans of “particular SoC builders,” whilst MediaTek referred us to Arm.


MediaTek Dimensity 5G chipset.

MediaTek Dimensity 5G chipset.

MediaTek was once a somewhat early mover within the AI silicon area, bringing an AI Processing Unit (APU) to its mid-range Helio P60 again in early 2019. The corporate has developed the AI silicon since then, and its Dimensity 1000 chipset now has a six-core APU, that includes two heavy cores, three medium cores, and one gentle core.

The corporate says this multi-core AI silicon setup lets in for a greater energy/power intake stability for a given process. So a Dimensity 1000-powered telephone can fan the flames of the sunshine core for facial popularity and get in touch with on a heavy core for camera-related duties.

Opinion: Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 and 7c are larger offers than you could suppose

The corporate touted 4.5 TOPS of computing energy, probably together with the APU best. Meanwhile, Qualcomm says its Snapdragon 865 AI Engine delivers 15 TOPS of efficiency, but it surely’s unclear whether or not this is applicable to the devoted AI silicon best or all of the chipset.

In any match, the third-party AI-Benchmark web page lists the Dimensity 1000 at quantity one (56,158 issues), forward of the second-placed Kirin 990 5G (52,403) and the Snapdragon 855 Plus (24,652). We can clearly be expecting the brand new Qualcomm chipset to climb the ranks, however may or not it’s quantity one? Either approach, AI benchmarks are in somewhat of a peculiar area at the moment, owing to the various AI {hardware} designs and the sheer collection of other workloads.


Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 in plastic case

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 in plastic case

Both the Dimensity 1000 and the Snapdragon 865 strengthen 5G, however the two industry wins within the spaces of community strengthen and integration. The Snapdragon 865 helps each mmWave and sub-6Ghz flavors of 5G. Meanwhile, the Dimensity 1000 best helps sub-6Ghz.

Sub-6Ghz is anticipated to be the dominant form of 5G connectivity anyway, however MediaTek’s loss of mmWave strengthen can be disappointing for subscribers within the likes of america, portions of Europe, and Japan. It additionally way the ones hoping for a real global telephone within the 5G technology, in a position to operating on any community, could be out of success with a Dimensity 1000 instrument for now.

Editor’s Pick

MediaTek’s processor gives an built-in 5G modem versus the Snapdragon 865’s exterior modem. Integrated answers are typically extra energy environment friendly and occupy a smaller area than exterior answers.

But Qualcomm posits that the Snapdragon 865’s modem is extra energy environment friendly at 4G than its earlier X24 modem anyway. It additionally touts mmWave strengthen, which presentations that built-in as opposed to exterior doesn’t essentially have a touching on functions. It’s very similar to the PC graphics card sector in many ways, the place exterior graphics playing cards are usually extra succesful however can eat a lot more energy than built-in answers.

In phrases of speeds, MediaTek says it helps 4.7Gbps downlink and 2.5Gbps uplink speeds. Meanwhile, Qualcomm boasts quicker speeds of 7.5Gbps downlink and 3Gbps uplink. The Dimensity 1000 additionally gives 5G+5G dual-SIM strengthen, which could be to hand for vacationers or in case your networks have patchy 5G protection.


Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 200MP slides

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 200MP slides

There’s no disputing that the Snapdragon 865 is the extra spectacular beast on this class, touting strengthen for as much as 200MP cameras (snapshots with out further processing), 64MP unmarried shooters, or 64MP/64MP twin sensors. Meanwhile, the MediaTek flagship processor serves up 80MP unmarried digital camera strengthen, 32MP/16MP twin sensors, and as much as five cameras another way (we suppose the Snapdragon 865 is in a similar fashion succesful relating to more than one cameras).

Turning to video recording, Qualcomm’s heavyweight SoC is probably the most spectacular chipset we’ve ever observed within the Android smartphone area. The processor gives 8K/30fps strengthen, 4K/120fps functions, and “limitless” 960fps tremendous slow-mo at 720p. The latter function doesn’t require a particular digital camera sensor paired with ultra-fast reminiscence, which is superb information as a result of nearly all extremely high-resolution sensors (40MP+) don’t be offering the desired reminiscence.

Read: Who in reality has actual 960fps tremendous gradual mo recording?

Other Snapdragon 865 options come with Dolby Vision recording, multi-frame noise relief, and the power to concurrently seize a 64MP symbol and 4K HDR video.

MediaTek, in the meantime, is topping out at 4K/60fps recording. This way it’s now not fairly as spectacular because the Qualcomm silicon relating to video, however places it on par with final yr’s flagship silicon and the brand new Kirin 990 from Huawei. Other functions come with multi-frame video HDR (4K), video noise relief, video bokeh, and strengthen for Google’s AV1 codec (now not observed at the Snapdragon chipset). There’s no phrase at the chipset’s strengthen for tremendous slow-motion video recording.

What else to grasp?

Both chips are beautiful complete featured in different spaces, as they each strengthen Bluetooth 5.1, Wi-Fi 6, and dual-frequency GPS functions.

Qualcomm’s chipset does dangle a bonus in reminiscence even though, supporting LPDDR5 RAM in comparison to the rather older LPDDR4X strengthen observed at the Dimensity 1000. The Snapdragon 865 additionally helps UFS 3.0 garage, whilst MediaTek best says it helps “UFS,” suggesting that that is UFS 2.1 as a substitute.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000: The early verdict

The MediaTek Dimensity 1000 5G SoC.

The MediaTek Dimensity 1000 5G SoC.

It’s encouraging to look MediaTek again within the flagship chipset recreation after the discontentment that was once its final upper finish processor. More chipset selection is all the time a excellent factor, because it must convey out the most productive of all silicon avid gamers and doubtlessly pressure down prices.

In announcing so, the spec sheet strongly means that Qualcomm’s chipset will to find its approach into extra top class flagships than the Dimensity 1000. The likes of 8K recording and UFS 3.0 are all anticipated to be necessities for 2020’s ~$1,000 telephones. Toss in Qualcomm’s historically tough Adreno graphics in addition to mmWave 5G strengthen, and also you’ve were given a monster of a processor on paper.

More chipset selection is all the time a excellent factor.

That’s to not say that the Dimensity 1000 doesn’t earn its flagship standing, handing over an overly aggressive CPU structure, the newest Arm graphics, dual-SIM 5G strengthen, and robust AI silicon through a minimum of one benchmark. MediaTek refuses to be drawn into questions on price, however we wouldn’t be shocked if the Dimensity 1000 is less expensive than the Snapdragon 865 too. So if anything else, shall we see the Dimensity 1000 to find its area of interest in inexpensive flagships.

That’s it for our Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 comparability. Which has inspired you probably the most on paper? Let us know within the feedback.

More posts about Qualcomm