You instructed us: Maximum of you assume your health tracker knowledge is excellent sufficient

(*17*)(*2*)xiaomi mi band 6 review heart rate sensor

(*20*)Credit score: Jimmy Westenberg /


Health trackers typically wish to be dependable, as the very last thing you need is in your gathered kilometers, steps taken, and extra to be utterly wrong. However simply how trusting are you of your tracker’s sensor knowledge?

That’s the topic of our newest ballot effects article, as we requested readers whether or not they concept their health tracker’s sensor knowledge was once correct. Right here’s the way you responded it.

Do you consider your health tracker’s sensor knowledge?


We posted the ballot on Thursday April 29, and it gathered over 2540 votes. A grand overall of 56.6% of respondents felt that their health tracker knowledge gave them a excellent common concept in their metrics. Maximum polled readers obviously don’t be expecting absolute best effects then, however are nonetheless pleased with what they’re getting.

In the meantime, simply over 1 / 4 of respondents stated they had been in reality skeptical of metrics from their health trackers. We’re no longer stunned such a lot of folks felt this fashion, particularly after units just like the Fossil Hybrid HR and Amazfit GTS 2 and GTR 2 demonstrated sketchy readings of a few type in our opinions.

In any case, 17.4% of polled readers felt that their health tracker knowledge was once certainly correct. And it’s comprehensible with units just like the Apple Watch and (*10*)Garmin VivoActive 4 incomes reward for correct monitoring in our opinions.


  • (*7*)saimin: My Garmin watch with integrated GPS is much more correct than my female friend’s Fitbit that will depend on her telephone’s GPS. Distances on my watch are all the time inside of 5% of what Google Maps calculates, whilst her distances are all the time 10% to 30% top, even if we’re working the similar path in combination.
  • (*5*)Phil Gartman: I’ve the Samsung equipment are compatible 2. The one factor I truly use it for is as a center charge track whilst I’m understanding. And for that I do know evidently that it’s in reality very correct. I am going to dialysis three instances every week the place my blood force and center charge are checked each half-hour. Extra continuously than no longer my tracker is lifeless on or inside of a few BPM. As for different metrics, I don’t truly care. For biking I’ve a devoted pc and Strava. I consider the ones way more.
  • (*6*)perico_jones: Let’s think they’re off via a little bit, however I simply care if I’m arbitrarily over or beneath 20K steps in an afternoon, no longer whether or not I did 20,000 or 20,005.
  • (*4*)Albin: ‘ll go away the overall health knowledge monitoring (for oneself and for multinational firms) to others, however did purchase a non-networked consumer-grade SPO2 fingertip reader follwing the massive NYT article a yr in the past, as caution unhealthy low blood oxygen for in a different way asymptomatic COVID-19, for early remedy. The pro assessments are regimen at clinical check-in. The house instrument is reasonably priced and correct to the level mid-90 readings are “secure” and surprising drops would imply name the physician.
  • Bryan Hill: For sure, Apple Watch has had some incorrect studying for me particularly on step depend and “workout” because it makes use of an excessively lenient depend.

Thank you for balloting in our health tracker ballot and for leaving feedback. What do you are making of the general effects? Tell us beneath.